paddington movie poster image

New Paddington movie got mostly positive reviews from top critics. TWC-Dimension released their new family/adventure flick, “Paddington,” into theaters today, and all the reviews are in from the top movie critics. It turns out that most of them liked it, giving it an overall 77 score out of a possible 100 at Metacritic.com.

The movie stars: Jim Broadbent, Nicole Kidman, Ben Whishaw, Sally Hawkins and Hugh Bonneville. We’ve added blurbs from a couple of the critics (below).

Alonso Duralde from TheWrap, gave it a great 91 score, saying: “There are plenty of laughs — and nothing that goes over a kid’s head to an adult funny bone is smutty or smarmy — and the sentiment never feels strained or artificial.”

Jason Clark from Entertainment Weekly, gave it a 91 score too, stating: “Paddington is fast-paced yet unhurried, serving up surprisingly subtle ideas on melting-pot urban diversity—Paddington is a stranger in a strange land, after all—and rich visual tableaux, including a gorgeous recurring shot of the Brown home as a living dollhouse.”

Betsy Sharkey over at the Los Angeles Times, gave it a 90 grade. She said: “Artfully and cleverly, the sweet spirit of that young bear from darkest Peru and his many London misadventures materializes brilliantly on screen in the very good hands of writer-director-conjurer Paul King.”

Joe Morgenstern at the Wall Street Journal, gave it a 90 score. He stated: “This comic chronicle of a Peruvian bear’s adventures in London turns out to be a total charmer, made with panache, élan and generous dollops of marmalade.”

Mary Houlihan at the Chicago Sun-Times, gave it an 88 score. He said: ” The filmmakers behind Paddington successfully bring the lovable bear into the future and strike a balance between honoring the spirit of the original books and updating the story for today’s young audiences. This is a charming film whose underlying message of tolerance and acceptance strikes a palpable chord in today’s world — both for children and adults.”

Kyle Smith at the New York Post, gave it a 75 score, saying: “How English is this movie? As English as a cold, rainy day at the beach. As English as the politeness that masks hostility, as English as a pie that contains meat, as English as secretly wishing you lived in some other country.”

Peter Keough from the Boston Globe, gave it a 75 grade. He said: “True, a lot of marmalade gets spread around, and at times the zaniness gets a bit too slap-sticky, but it’s all good clean fun.”

Walter Addiego at the San Francisco Chronicle, gave it a 75 score, saying: “Suffice it to say that this is good family fare with plenty of decent gags (visual and otherwise), and it’s nicely acted by all the principals. In addition, Julie Walters, Peter Capaldi and Jim Broadbent turn up in smaller but still lively roles.”

Claudia Puig from USA Today, gave it a 75 score, stating: ” Whishaw, Hawkins and Downton Abbey’s Bonneville strike just the right notes. Imaginative production design, which occasionally brings to mind Wes Anderson’s “Moonrise Kingdom,” adds to the story’s appeal.”

Peter Travers at Rolling Stone, gave it a 75 score, saying: “It’s funny. So is Nicole Kidman, very Cruella De Vil as Millicent Clyde, a taxidermist with an eye on adding Paddington to her stuffed collection. It’s an excuse for some chase scenes and physical comedy (Paddington gets his head stuck in a toilet bowl) that manage to suggest both the Marx brothers and Wes Anderson. I mean that as a good thing.”

Michael Phillips at the Chicago Tribune, gave it a 75 grade. He said: ” Any movie that manages to work in a dig at the National Theatre’s heavier pretensions — in a subway sequence, Paddington trots by a National poster for a (fake) play with the amusingly dour title “Damned by Despair” — is OK with me.”

Leslie Felperin at the The Hollywood Reporter, gave it a 70 grade, stating: ” It’s a relief to report that the final film is actually quite charming, thoughtful and as cuddly as a plush toy, albeit one with a few modern gizmos thrown in.”

Guy Lodge from Variety, gave it a 70, saying: “Affectionately honoring the everyday quirks of Bond’s stories, while subtly updating their middle-class London milieu, King’s film may divide loyal Paddingtophiles with its high-stakes caper plot, but their enraptured kids won’t care a whit.”

Jeannette Catsoulis at The New York Times, gave it a 60 score. She stated: “In stark contrast to their furry, blundering star, the makers of Paddington have colored so carefully inside the lines that any possibility of surprise or subversion is effectively throttled.”

Lastly, Elizabeth Weitzman over at the New York Daily News, gave it a 60, stating: “Cute, mostly well-mannered and just a bit off-center.” Stay tuned. Follow us on Facebook by Clicking Here. Follow us on Google Plus by Clicking Here. Follow us on Twitter by Clicking Here.

Did You Enjoy this Post? Subscribe to Hollywood Hills on Facebook, Twitter, & Email